The idea is simple: If there’s a fire in a tall building that blocks the main stairwell, people need an alternative way to evacuate, preferably one that is somewhat protected or at least far away from where the fire is happening. If you’re in a one or two story building, it’s pretty simple: just get out of any window or door. You may get hurt a little, but you’ll still be away from the fire. In the denser cities of the early United States, though, as the buildings grew taller, the options for evacuation became more complicated. High-profile, horrific building fires were a nearly constant plague in factories, tenements, office buildings, and theaters. The external fire escape seemed obvious to many: Bolt a metal staircase to the outside of the building with a landing below a window on each floor.
Whatever Happened to Fire Escapes
[Note that this article is a transcript of the video embedded above.] The idea is simple: If there’s a fire in a tall building that blocks the main stairwell, people need an alternative way to evacuate, preferably one that is somewhat protected or at least far away from where the fire is happening
Key takeaways
Fire escapes were introduced as an alternative evacuation method in tall buildings but their effectiveness and necessity have been debated.
- Fire escapes were designed to help evacuate buildings during fires when main stairwells were blocked.
- Their effectiveness and value have been questioned over time.
- Building owners often prioritize economic factors over safety features like fire escapes.
Summarised automatically by AI from the original article by Hacker News. AI can make mistakes, so check the original for details.
Story details
- Published
- By
- sohkamyung
- Format
- Article
- Original
- practical.engineering ↗
Related reporting
2 stories on this topic from 2 sources, oldest first.
- Hacker News Whatever Happened to Fire Escapes (this story)






