GP2025: Are we acting on paranoia? We only need to worry if there are plenty of terrorists in the land, which would only reflect badly on the prime minister’s inability to stop such people.

But I suspect the main reason is to create a narrative to draw attention to another public enemy number one, so that no one asks questions about the alleged unconstitutional decisions his attorney-general is being queried about.

He signed off on the people’s constitutional rights with a memorandum of understanding, and he’s now worried about data leakage. Hence, is he following the example of rogue nations like Iraq and Iran in banning Waze?

He can’t solve the constitutional crisis in Negeri Sembilan, and he bans Waze to protect against data leakage to Israel, which only targets terrorists?